Cliff Jumping

In the interest of accuracy, I’ll tell you now that this is about dreams I had. Some people just hate hearing anything about dreams. “Oh God, not more dream crap,” they say to themselves. But I’m going to tell you about them anyway.

They were weird dreams, but they were excellent. I say that, and you immediately jump to the conclusion that they were wet dreams. They absolutely weren’t.

I used to dream about flying. When I was a kid, I dreamt about flying quite a bit. But I never took off from the ground. It started by falling. The first few dreams made me scared, because it seemed like I was just going to plummet to my doom.

But whenever I fell–whether it was a tall building or a mountain or whatever—I always started flying before I hit the ground.

After I’d had that kind of dream a few times, I started looking for high places to jump from. I’d stopped being scared at all and just went in search of places to jump from.

It was better if I was running from someone, so being deliberate only worked a couple of times. It was usually I was being chased and suddenly found myself on top of a cliff or in front of a twentieth story window. And so, I’d either get caught or jump. And so, I always jumped off, started falling, and then started floating before I sailed away.

I began trying to sleep all the time. I started missing school and extra-curriculars so that I could get more dreaming in. I had been a decent student, if a little unmotivated. But, by then, I was just useless.

My parents worried—of course they did. They tried forcing me to keep going to school at least, but I just kept dozing off in class, and eventually even the teachers didn’t want me there. They encouraged me to skip if all I was going to do was come to school to fall asleep.

I didn’t really hurt anyone. In fact, if anyone was getting hurt, it was really just me. The other kids had thought that the sleeping was funny at first, but soon they were making fun of me. I was that weird kid who slept all the time. It wasn’t about being a sleepy rebel against the teachers, but just that weirdo who dozed off constantly.

Eventually my parents sent me to a psychologist. I know now that he was actually pretty sketchy, but at the time, I got along with him really well. It initially seemed like narcolepsy, but it was quickly apparent that it wasn’t compulsive. I was very deliberately trying to sleep.

And even then, he eventually understood that it wasn’t really sleep that I wanted. What I really liked doing was flying. And he understood why I might try to sleep constantly if that led to flying.

But he also pointed out that I couldn’t just keep sleeping away while things were happening in the waking world. He told me the story of his cigarette dreams.

He had quit smoking about a decade before, but he said the best cigarettes he’d ever had were in the previous ten years. They were dream smokes, and they were way better than the real cigarettes had ever been.

In dreams, the cigarettes opened his head up to the heavens and made him feel like God was massaging his brain using nicotine. And then he woke up, and after a minute or two, he realized he’d never smoked at all.

So, it was even better than he’d thought. Because he never even had to feel bad that he’d been smoking again. The feeling of the heavenly smoke was gone by that point, but he’d had a cigarette without consequences. And it was excellent.

But the dream cigarettes had never made him want to take up smoking again. And he’d never had dream smokes when he was actually a smoker. The dream smokes only occurred because he’d quit smoking.

And I only flew because I couldn’t actually fly. Which is why it was so fantastic. But he convinced me that it was things in the real world that failed us and that failure is what made things in the dreamworld fantastic.

I still wasn’t a great student. But I stopped trying to force myself to doze off all the time. Only when things were really hard did I try to go to sleep and find a cliff.

Parasocial Politics

Like all old men, I long for the old days. Time was there was a constant, lingering disdain for politicians in general. Obviously, people still voted, but there was an underlying suspicion and distrust of ALL politicians. That obviously wasn’t exactly good, but it still beat the weird parasocial relationship we seem determined to foster for ourselves with politicians now. And it’s kind of embarrassing, but the people who seem most into it are other old people.

Politics has devolved into a kind of “my team” vs “their team” thing. At one point it was simply taken as a given that if there were teams, then the politicians were on one, and we all were on the other. Now, we seem to think that our politicians are angelic saviours while theirs are the devil incarnate. It’s ridiculous.

This whole thing feels like there was a game we played, and it was frustrating most of the time, but it was the only game in town, so we had to put up with it. Now, instead of tossing the board or just quitting the game, folks seem determined to keep the game but make up rules on the fly. So whatever works best for them is the new rule. Keep calling it by the same name, just make sure it will always work out in your favour. Like playing chess, but you decide that the queen can just teleport around the board whenever she wants.

And your side winning carries the future of humanity. Seriously? Talk about megalomania.

I think, ironically, this whole situation demonstrates instead a kind of unhappy tribalism that is indicative of how little the human brain has changed in thousands of years. We are just as determined for our guy to win as a dog is to protect his owner. The difference is that we aren’t trying to govern the world by a dog’s consciousness. We ARE trying to govern the world using that part of ourselves.

And further, we assert that we have some sort of actual relationship with the political leaders and groups that make up these teams. This can be seen as just a cynical attempt to capture votes, but I also think that we’ve worked so diligently to create convincing narratives that at least to a certain extent, even the beneficiaries of our tribalism believe that it is actually a valid belief. They are told constantly how great they are, and unsurprisingly, they believe it.

Which brings us back to the weird parasocial relationship that people seem determined to foster with their politicians. The leader of my team is dreamy and fantastic, and the leader of their team is the devil incarnate. Because the political leader of the group is the personification of our team, and so if he loses, then I lose also, because I’m on the team.

I can’t help but miss the days when a political leader was kind of “hired” rather than a supposed manifestation of a political viewpoint. So, you could be a conservative without expressing any loyalty to anyone in particular. You were conservative regardless of who was the leader of your party. You were on the conservative team without having to swear allegiance to a specific person. The parties, like the whole government, belonged to citizens, not leaders. The leaders were hired in order to assert a particular viewpoint in the government, not as representational avatars of the entire movement.

I think what these people are despite the democratic palaces that we house them in, that they are ultimately the top civil servants. They aren’t really “leaders,” they are employees. So, the goal isn’t really to “win” exactly, but to hire the best person. A loss doesn’t affect my team membership or who I cheer for. My beliefs don’t demand a particular person. Maybe some particular policies, but not a specific politician.

Fermi’s Paradox

If we’re not alone in the universe, where is everybody? I think that’s what Fermi’s paradox means with some paraphrasing.

I think the first issue is that we’re looking for more aliens like us. We seem to assume that intelligent life looks like us, acts like us… etc. We anthropomorphize alien life without even knowing whether it’s out there or not.

Just want to point out that it seems like “good” aliens are almost always bipedal humanoids. The “evil” ones, who are trying to conquer us, seem to be the only ones to get any attention from the design departments. If they’re good, they’re cute. Sometimes in the fuzzy animal way, but often more like a variation on humans with maybe some big eyes or something.

Also, I’ve seen a few movies now that have evil aliens that want to take over the earth and strip it of all it’s resources. Wait… isn’t that what we do? Is that why we get so mad about it, because we want to be the ones to take over the planet and strip away all the resources? Is this just some satirical trope that I’m too stupid to catch? Who needs an alien civilization to rape the planet?

Anyway, seems totally possible that intelligent life in the universe is probably completely unlike us. There’s a huge variety of environments in the galaxy, and it’s likely that there’s all kinds of different kinds of life and intelligence. Maybe there’s intelligent life that has absolutely no interest in interstellar travel.

Or tech, period. Tech has been a really mixed bag for us. Given the world as it currently exists, it seems possible that some other form of life might have decided not to go down the tech road, knowing that it might just lead to misery. In which case, they wouldn’t have interstellar travel and have no intention of trying to develop it.

Maybe interstellar travel isn’t really even possible. So, even if the intelligent life really wanted to, it cannot get to this planet, nor we to them. That’s kind of where our own tech is right now, and maybe we’re just not going to be able to solve that.

Or maybe there’s intelligent life that’s already detected us and decided they want nothing to do with us. Just because we’re absolutely desperate for company in the galaxy doesn’t mean that everyone is. So maybe they came to the planet, looked at some of our media, and then decided they needed to take off. Maybe not least because of the weird ideas we seem to have about aliens.

So maybe the aliens showed up, looked around and said to themselves “No thanks.” Maybe they reacted to us the way that some people might react to a really messed up acquaintance of theirs. Maybe they even really liked us, but they know that we’ll end badly and don’t want to get involved in that.

For that matter, what if, after a few years or something, we decided we didn’t like the aliens? You really like The Bachelor and their ongoing hostility to that show just pisses you off. What are you going to do? You can’t just unfriend an alien race.

Which brings up another issue. The SETI question seems a little like the modern Fountain of Youth or El Dorado. We really desperately want intelligent life to exist, and only time is going to convince us that it’s not there. It feels like we’ll keep pursuing this until reality forces us to let it go. Though the resurgence of Flat Earth theories shows that maybe reality is not that connected to our beliefs anyway.

Given the fairly disastrous record of intelligent life on this planet, maybe it just dies off before it gets to the interplanetary exploration stage. I’m sorry, but isn’t it possible that intelligent life is just a problem that pops up in healthy ecosystems on a fairly regular basis, and then it wipes itself out?

Without knowing tons of scientific stuff, it seems clear that they must be looking for transmissions of some sort. Our own existence on this planet has been extremely brief and recent. The period of time during which we transmitted anything is much briefer. If other life followed the same pattern, then we’d basically be looking for a transmission from a very brief period of time in which they might have been transmitting something. It doesn’t seem like a real good way of looking for intelligent life. Though, admittedly, I don’t know what else we could do.

Also, pretty sure the Romans didn’t transmit anything, nor did the ancient Chinese or anyone else. A transmission might be the only thing we can hope to find, but surely a transmission isn’t much of an indication of either the presence or absence of intelligent life. Were we only “intelligent life” when we figured out radio? Also, now that most stuff flows through Internet wires, are we unintelligent again? Actually, that sometimes seems pretty true, but it’s obviously not what I meant.

Finally, I’m pretty sure anything we might be able to look at is going to be old. Even light takes a long time to get anywhere in space, never mind transmissions. So even if we find something, it would be ancient. Like, older than we’ve been here as a species. If we find evidence of intelligent life that took 500,000 years to get here, would it still really even count, given that we are only about 200,000 years old? It would be possible that we could find something, and the civilization that it came from is long gone.

In any case, I’ve forced myself to sit through some fairly obvious attempt to explain the lack of other intelligent life, but it mostly seemed like kind of pie in the sky stuff. Explain the absence without admitting that maybe there just isn’t any. Or maybe they don’t want anything to do with us. Or maybe they’re out there, but we’re just not going to be able to find them, no matter how hard we try.

I think Fermi’s paradox is pretty easy to answer. We just don’t like the answers.

 

William’s Death

William was facing the wall, but he was still able to hear the men talking behind him. He was on his knees in front of a brick wall. They were only about ten feet away, discussing his fate. What they were saying was extremely clear. As he listened, he stared up at the ravaged, brick wall in front of him. Though he couldn’t see the men’s actual faces, he started to associate each voice he heard with a different section of the wall.

There was a deep voice that he put with the rough mortar between the bricks. There was a high, smooth voice that he placed with a brick that was smooth instead of ridged like the others. There was a gravelly sounding voice that he associated with a part of the wall that was below him to his right. It was pock-marked with bullet holes, and some of the mortar was falling out completely. There was some graffiti on the wall above him, but he listened in vain for a voice to go with it. Someone had gone to the trouble of painting a rebel logo on the wall. Maybe it was before the shooting had started. It seemed a bit pointless, but it also seemed to demonstrate the belief that support for a thing was actually valuable. That belief seemed to have demonstrated itself false, but it was a belief that William kept wishing were actually true. He kept trying to match it to a voice, but none of them seemed quite right.

Those were the main voices, but there were others as well.  There were eight men and most of them didn’t speak. And even when one of the other men piped up, he generally had very little to say. Even though it seemed like it was a fairly big decision for the men to make, there wasn’t really much to talk about. They were on the march deep behind the lines and couldn’t take prisoners, so they had to make other arrangements. They weren’t sure whether to execute him, injure him so he couldn’t keep fighting or just let him go free and depend on him to leave. This was obviously what William wanted, and he was, actually, intending to just leave if they let him go. He really didn’t care who won, and certainly not enough to keep fighting about it. Naturally, he was curious about what was going to happen to him, but at the same time, he found it disconcerting having to listen.

The gravelly voice was really pushing for execution. He was arguing that they definitely wanted William out of the fight, and the only way to get that done was either to take him prisoner or kill him. Since they couldn’t take him prisoner, they’d have to kill him. William found himself sympathizing with this argument until he remembered who they were talking about. Then he hoped that the best argument wouldn’t win.

For a moment they talked about injuring him instead. The idea was brought forward by someone that William hadn’t heard before. The voice seemed unsure of itself, and even though it had brought the idea of an injury up, it didn’t seem to think it was actually a very good idea.

It was an unremarkable voice, and he couldn’t decide which part of the wall it would even go with. It definitely didn’t fit with the graffiti. William had to smile despite himself about how snobby he had gotten about that graffiti. There was no way that a hesitant, mediocre voice was going to get that spot.

The deep voice immediately objected, saying that injury was nothing but a cruel and cowardly method of execution. It pointed out that any injury they inflicted would almost certainly be fatal. William would just lie on the ground and bleed to death without any help. So even if the intent was simply to ensure William’s removal from the conflict, it would likely result in prolonged suffering and death. The deep voice said that, though he would have preferred imprisonment, a straight execution would be a better option than just leaving him to bleed out.

After this admission, the two voices argued for a while, but the gravelly voice was clearly winning. The other voices agreed with him, and the deep voice was the only holdout left. William could hear a bit of desperation seeping into the voice, and he kind of knew that he’d lost. Both of them had lost.

The gravelly voice pointed out that William’s side wouldn’t hesitate to kill one of them. The deep voice responded by saying that that was an even better reason not to do it. They were fighting an actual war so as not to be like the other side, and so if the other side would have had no problem with an execution, it was an even better reason not to do it themselves.

However, the first voice had already convinced the others. Different voices expressed varying degrees of sympathy for the deep voice and for William, but the discussion was now just focussed on how they would kill William, not on whether they actually should. They were feeling bad about it, but it didn’t change anything. They still had to deal with him, and they had limited options for how they were going to do that.

The idea of a firing squad was briefly considered, but the deep voice proclaimed that he wanted no part of it. William heard the swishing sounds of someone walking away—presumably the deep voice leaving. After he had left, nobody else seemed to be that interested either, and even the gravelly voice was hesitant. There was no longer any discussion, just the sound of uncomfortable silence. Eventually the gravelly voice spoke up again, saying that, if no one else was willing to help him, he would take care of it himself.

William heard a mechanical click behind him and then felt the muzzle of a rifle under his left ear. William had often been accused of thinking too much, and that came back to him as the muzzle rested under his ear. He should have been angry or desperate or something, but he mostly just felt sad. It was depressing that his own death seemed so reasonable.

After a while, William started to get a little impatient. The execution was happening, and it seemed like it’d be better to just get it done with. He wondered what the gravelly voice was waiting for, and then the muzzle of the gun jerked, and he stopped wondering. He’d never figured out which voice the graffiti should go with.

 

The Alarm

Northrup was going through his old files when he came across the folder that his mom had put together many years before. It was full of newspaper clippings about him and the machine that he’d invented. Most of them were from the weekly local paper of the small town that she’d been living in, but there were also a few from larger daily newspapers as well. Looking through the articles, he realized that, at least for some of them, she must have had to go searching to get them, since they weren’t from papers that she’d have even subscribed to.

Twenty years earlier Northrup had invented a kind of “life alarm.” The machine had been very popular for a few years. How it worked was that you entered your goals, and then you entered your actions as you went about daily life. If the machine saw that you were getting off track and doing things that wouldn’t help you get to your destination, it let you know. Unlike a standard alarm clock, it didn’t beep at you, but instead, the voice of a gentle British woman reminded you of where you were actually trying to get.

In spite of its initial popularity, it wasn’t long before the machine started to cause some controversy. The troubles culminated in Northrup being sued over one young man’s goals. An aunt took him to court because her nephew had entered that he wanted to get as high as possible. Whenever he wasn’t stoned, the alarm would gently chide him, and encourage him to smoke something or take a pill. They had to forcibly separate him from the machine before they could get him into rehab. The young man got himself straightened out eventually, but he became very critical of the machine, blaming it, in part, for his problems with substance abuse.

In the end, the judge found that Northrup couldn’t be held responsible for the goals that people punched into his alarm. However, even though he won the court case, the machine quickly lost popularity. It wasn’t long before no store would sell it, and Northrup faced bankruptcy. Soon no more alarms were being made.

Northrup had continued working on it, regardless. He hoped that he could fix some of the flaws that led to the court case. However, he found the problems insurmountable, and wanted to just put the whole thing behind him. He’d grown sick of the alarm, and he soon stopped even trying to fix it. The machine became nothing more than an idea when Northrup scrapped the last prototype. He was hoping that he’d never hear any more about it.

However, the alarm had been popular for long enough to spur quite a few articles. His mother had carefully clipped and stored as many as she could find. Northrup himself hadn’t bothered to keep more than a few of them and at the same time as he’d junked the prototype, he’d also burned the articles he’d kept, wishing that he’d never even imagined the machine in the first place. As a result, other than the articles that his mother had kept, there was no evidence left of the success that Northrup and his invention had enjoyed.

His mother had died several years before. It should have been old age that got her, but it was a car accident instead. Her car had been hit while she was pulling out of her driveway onto a busy street. A younger person in a newer car would have been all right, but she was in her eighties and the car was too old to have effective air bags. So, she held on for a little while, but after a few days, she died of her injuries.

Northrup was devastated, but he wasn’t sure that he was devastated enough. Even in his relationship with his mother, the alarm had taken its toll. Right up until the end, she had continued to insist on his brilliance, and that had made Northrup angry. One utterly failed invention, and she would not let go of the belief that he was a genius. At the time, he’d been working in a shoe store. He kind of liked it and wondered why he’d ever even tried for anything else.

His mother wasn’t satisfied with it, however. She kept forwarding him job offers to teach in Engineering departments. He’d told her many times that universities didn’t hire failed inventors with a bachelor’s degree to teach courses, but she wouldn’t listen.

After her death he had found the articles while he was going through her stuff. He was still working at the shoe store, but at least he had become the manager. Most of his staff were too young to know about his past, and those that were old enough to remember were also too smart to bring it up. Since he no longer had to serve the public very much, it was only very rarely that he had to deal with any random customer knowing who he was. Or at least, even if they figured it out, it was very rare that anyone said anything.

Looking through the articles, most of them described him as a visionary of some sort. His mother hadn’t kept the later articles that described him as deluded or arrogant or other unpleasant things. She didn’t like to think of him that way, so she had just willfully ignored what people actually thought of him by that time.

He found himself angered by the articles. If there had been at least some of the negative articles as well as the glowing ones, he might have found the experience less irritating. Though maybe he wouldn’t have. It wouldn’t have been great reading that he was delusional any more than it was reading about his genius. When he found them, he thought about taking them out to the backyard and burning them like he’d burnt the others.

However, he soon calmed down. Besides the articles, his mother had kept a box of his report cards and his awards. The report cards portrayed Northrup as a budding genius, like the articles had. He had always gotten good marks, and his teachers gushed about his natural abilities and talent.

So instead of burning them, he placed the folder full of articles into the same box with the report cards. He put it to one side, determined that when he started packing everything back up, it would go on the bottom. He’d be able to forget about it without actually having to get rid of it.

The folder was hers and even though it was about him, he didn’t feel right about destroying it. She had been deluded about him right until the end, and no matter how much he might want to, he couldn’t change her mind anymore. The delusion was hers, and he didn’t feel he had the right to wreck it even after she had died.

Meritocracy

The issue I have with the idea of meritocracy is that I just don’t see how you can assess “merit” objectively. The very concept of merit is subjective. Different word for it, but we’re essentially saying that this person “deserves” something in particular. In the case of meritocracy, it’s usually some sort of job or “career.”

People only deserve anything at all through the action of the human imagination. It’s never a result of the examination of some sort of objective reality.

Not to say that all judgements we make are terrible. Or unnecessary. But they are NEVER connected to some hypothetical, eternal reality. They are ALWAYS a matter of interpreting reality (often in the most convenient way for us) and making a decision based on that interpretation.

So, when we claim that we’re being meritocratic, there are a huge number of interpretations that are involved in that statement.

I’ll use myself as an example. I tend to be good at school and tests. Not that I don’t do any work at it, but writing a twenty-page essay is pretty doable.

This hasn’t made me particularly good at jobs. In the workplace, my social skills are pretty weak, and I like to think of myself as the poster child for “too smart for his own good.” Whatever you might think about that, I definitely have the tendency to over-think almost everything. And it can sometimes be hard to draw a line between actual smartness and over-thinking.

In any case, I can pass your test, and I’ll probably do well. Does that mean that I “merit” the job? What if I actually do know quite a bit, but my social skills are terrible? What if I’m good at tests but useless at interviews? Or what if I’m fine at test and interviews, but just insufferable as a co-worker?

All I’m trying to say is that the concept of merit is very elusive, and almost certain, at some point, to require some sort of judgement to be made. And it’s not to say that we shouldn’t ever make judgements, but just that we be honest about it and recognize that this is what’s happening. We’re making a judgement call, and it’s not based on some objective fact.

What we’ve set ourselves up for is a kind of dictatorship of the worthy. I don’t know how this is different from the kinds of tyrannies we imagine ourselves free of in the modern era. The merits of a particular group of people is implicit to justification of most dictatorships, and the assertion that they have a right to power over us.